交流评论、关注点赞

  • Facebook Icon脸书专页
  • telegram Icon翻墙交流电报群
  • telegram Icon电报频道
  • RSS订阅禁闻RSS/FEED订阅

《议报》记者 周宏:杨建利在美国共和党地方党部林肯/里根晚餐年会上发表主题演讲

2019年05月14日 10:23 PDF版 分享转发

地方党部林肯/年会上发表主题演讲

《议报》记者  周宏

2019年5月12日

5月11日(星期六)晚公民力量发起人杨建利博士在“六四”三十周年前夕应邀在地方党部的年度活动上发表主题演讲,活动是由共和党华盛顿州Skagit县党部举办的林肯/里根晚餐年会,近300位共和党活跃分子和支持者参加了活动。

杨建利主题演讲的题目是“让美国再次伟大:林肯和里根是川普总统和美国人民的光辉榜样”。杨建利首先简述了自己对社会主义专制制度灾难的亲身经历,进而讲述了“六四”后美国对中共绥靖政策造成目前对美国和自由世界以及中国民主化前景不利的局面。杨建利赞美林肯和里根,说这两位他所特别敬仰的美国总统都是“解放者”。杨建利说“不仅解放了黑奴,而且在美国价值原则纯粹性的基础上保卫了美国联邦,这纯粹的价值原则就是:民主、自由、平等。里根总统1987年6月12日站在离柏林墙100码之处发表他被后人最为称赞和纪念的演讲‘戈尔巴乔夫先生,推到这堵墙!’他的远见和道义勇气领导自由世界赢得了冷战的胜利”,他说:“根本上说,美国是一个以价值观为基石建立的国家,从华盛顿到杰佛逊,从林肯到里根,美国的脚步一直有理想和信仰指引,这种理想主义的特质不仅在国家层面上确保了稳固和繁荣,也在个体层面上激发了美国人的创造力和潜能。抽去了理想主义和对美国价值的信仰,美国将会在根本上失去其作为一个伟大国家的动力,甚至可以说失去了灵魂,因而也无从谈到伟大。美国面临过不止一次危机,如内战、二战、冷战、911恐怖袭击,但我们会发现,美国人对危机的应对,往往成为内在潜能被激发的机会。为什么危机会带给美国发展的动力?这与美国的理想主义和价值观基石是密不可分的:就短期来讲,民主制度并不保证最高效率,也无法避免任何社会都会逐渐滋生的富贵病和慵惰心理,危机意识是对社会的一种必要刺激,而美国的民主制度可以确保其面对危机时的团结和凝聚力,并唤起美国人对国家和自由制度的自豪感。”

杨建利特别针对中美贸易争端做了如下论述“林肯面对的问题当然不同于川普,但如果我们不恰当把‘北方——南方’与‘美国——中国’做一个不恰当的比喻的话,他们的处境颇为相似,也许是值得川普深思的。19世纪初,黑人奴隶问题在美国本已呈现式微趋势,但南方棉花种植业的繁荣开启了美国国内贩奴的又一波热潮,形成了国内贩奴的‘第二条中间道路’,前后约三十年时间,南方利用调动资源的低人权成本(奴隶制)和北方提供的自由市场,获得棉花贸易的巨大财富,使南方奴隶主产生了对奴隶制的“制度自信”;上世纪九十年代初,苏联的解体和中国的六四事件导致共产主义意识形态破产,几乎全世界都乐观地以为历史将要‘终结’,但同样是三十年左右的时间,中共利用低人权、低环保成本以及西方提供的自由市场迅速成长,不仅摆脱了六四后人们对其政权是否还能稳定的疑问,反而产生了‘四个自信’,开始借助其越来越强大的经济和军事实力,开始挑战所谓的‘美国霸权’。200年前,内部的低人权和外部的自由市场造就了美国南方奴隶主的强大和自信,同样的,进30年来,内部的低人权和外部的自由市场造就了中共专制政权的强大和自信。林肯当年面对这抉择:对南方关闭市场而不管它的奴隶制度,或者,结束它的奴隶制度。我们每一个人知道林肯的最终选择。”

杨建利最后追问“面对着中共,川普总统能否效法林肯面对南方奴隶制时、里根面对苏联共产帝国时所做伟大壮举?”

杨建利演讲结束时,全场起立鼓掌。

附演讲英文稿原文

To Make America Great Again: Lincoln and Reagan Standing as Shining Examples for President Trump and American People to Follow

Ad:美好不容错过,和家人朋友一起享受愉快时光,现在就订票

–Speech at Skagit County Republican Lincoln/Reagan Dinner

Yang Jianli

May 11, 2019, Skagit, State of Washington, USA

Good evening. Thank you Jacquelin for your kind introduction. What an honor to be in the company of you and Mr. Davidson speaking at this Lincoln/Reagan Dinner. Lincoln and Reagan are definitely among the American presidents I admire most.  They are both liberators.

President Lincoln not only freed the slaves but saved the Union. He not only saved the Union, but saved it  “in the purity of its principles”, that is, in the principles of democracy, liberty, and equality.  He redefined the concept of freedom.

On June 12, 1987, President Reagan stood just 100 yards away from the Berlin Wall and uttered some of the most unforgettable words of his presidency: “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.”  Berlin Wall stood as a vivid symbol of the battle between communism and democracy that divided Berlin, Germany and the entire European continent. His vision and guts helped the free world win the Cold War and defeated communism in Europe.

Few of you in this room know what it feels like to be blessed with freedom after living under the oppression of socialism and communism.  When the Venezuelan military vehicles drove into a crowd of civilians about two weeks ago, I was reminded of the horrors of the Chinese tanks running over students in the Tiananmen Square Massacre whose 30th anniversary we will commemorate next month.  The dictators have done in Venezuela all of the similar things that the dictators have done in China. Be it socialism with Chinese characteristics or Venezuelan characteristics.  The results have been catastrophic. I have a first-hand understanding of these catastrophes.

I was born three years before the Cultural Revolution. At an early age, the unspeakable sufferings that most families had at the hands of the communist dictatorship, including mine, made me disenchanted with the Chinese Communist Party (the CCP).  However, I was enticed into joining the party with the idea of reforming it from within.  This all changed when I returned from my Ph.D. studies in the U.S., to join thousands of my fellow students in Beijing as Chinese army tanks rolled across Tiananmen Square on the morning of June 4, 1989.  Luckier than most of my fellow students, I narrowly escaped the massacre and the ensuing arrests and returned to the United States. While I continued my studies, I immersed myself in the work advancing human rights and democracy in China. In the Party’s eyes, the former young communist star had now become a public enemy. I became persona non grata, a traitor, prohibited from entering the country.  But in the spring of 2002, I decided to defy the ban.  In China’s industrial northeast, thousands of workers were taking to the streets, protesting the destitution brought on by government exploiting policies. Sensing an opportunity to forge bonds with grassroots activists, I entered China using a borrowed passport and forged ID card. 

For two weeks I met with exploited construction laborers, expropriated farmers, and striking workers, documenting their grievances and the condition of their lives and helping them with non-violent struggle strategies. But as I attempted to slip out of China across the Burmese border, my fake ID was spotted and I found myself in the hands of the security police. 

I was detained for five years.  Much of those years I spent in solitary confinement.  My mental condition deteriorated beneath endless isolation, repeated interrogations and ongoing psychological and physical torture. I prayed and prayed to God for understanding of his purpose for me and for spiritual strength to sustain myself.  I resorted to composing poems in my head and committing them to memory as a means of maintaining my sanity. Nearing a breakdown, I grasped onto my innermost resources of belief, imagination, and will to fend off insanity and find a reason to live.  “Am I wrong?” I asked myself with a tinge of regret. But I repeated a thought experiment: imagining of myself taking a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, arbitrarily choosing anyone on the Chinese streets, showing the document, asking them with the language they understand whether they want the rights listed there. Would anybody say No?  Of course, Not. Nobody wants to be a slave. In this regard, the Chinese people are no different than any other people in the world. The thirst for freedom and dignity is indeed universal. I drew strength and inspiration from this first order of fact.

I also thought of my fallen brothers and sisters in Tiananmen Square. I reassured myself that freedom is not free. Freedom must be earned. It was not free for those who paid with their lives. It is certainly not free for those of us who, while still blessed with our lives, have yet to complete the mission for which these brave students gave their lives and their freedom. I must not give up!

To make a long story short, in 2007, thanks to the overwhelming support from America and the international community, I was freed, returned to the US and recommitted myself to the hard work to advance human rights and democracy in China.

We were asked by American friends after Tiananmen: “Yes, we believe in the universality of democracy and freedom, but other than that, why should we care about whether, and how fast, China becomes democratic?”

 

My answer was simple. “If China is allowed to continue its path of economic and military buildup under a one-party dictatorship, it will pose a serious threat to the security and economic interest of America and even its very democratic way of life.”

Unfortunately, what I said nearly 30 years ago has become a reality today.

 

China has been waging economic war against industrial democracies ever since America allowed it a normal trade status. And now China has emerged as the greatest economic and national security threat the United States has ever faced. America is running the largest trade deficit with China, $350 billion annually. We must not forget China’s human rights deficit has contributed largely to America’s trade deficit with China. Low human rights is a big advantage of China in trading with free market economies just like the slavery system is an advantage of the South in trading with the North before the Civil War. 

 

China is serving as a model for dictators and juntas. In fact, it is already a model and a leading supporter of these regimes. Pick a dictator anywhere on the globe—from North Korea to Venezuela, from Cuba to Iran—and you’ll almost certainly find that the CCP is supporting it today.

 

In the United States today, the CCP takes advantage of our freedom and democracy to solidify its position at home. It, or its surrogates, has wide access to our universities, think tanks, and media through which they can advance their opinions and rationalize their actions.

 

The Chinese government has co-opted numerous American businessmen and academics by providing them with favorable business opportunities and all manner of privileges; in turn, they serve the purposes and interests of the Chinese government back in America as lobbyists for favorable policies towards China.

 

Make no mistake, the expansion of China’s military power is also a significant and alarming development. Throughout  past decades, China’s defense budget has increased much faster than its GDP. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army is acquiring more than enough power to intimidate surrounding East Asian countries, some of them America’s allies.

President Trump’s raising tariffs on China’s import yesterday demonstrates the severity of these threats. Indeed, President Trump has been making the long-awaited right shift in China policy, beginning to take China as what it is.

But I would like to remind tonight: The trade deal under negotiation is not something between two similar systems seeking closer ties. Rather, this is a fundamental clash between two radically different economic models which are deeply rooted in differing and even conflicting values and beliefs. Put it simply: ultimately it is not about money but value. The United States was built on the cornerstone of values. From Mayflower Convention to Declaration of Independence. From the Constituent Assembly to Lincoln’s Gettysburg speech to Reagan’s “Tear down this wall”, the United States of America was guided by ideals and faith every step of the way.  The idealistic qualities have not only ensured stability and prosperity at the national level but also inspired the creativity and potential of Americans at the individual level. If the idealism and belief in American values were taken away, the United States would lose its soul, the fundamental driving force that made America great in the first place.

 

The United States faced many crises in history: the Civil War, World War II, the Cold War,  9/11 terrorist attacks, you name it. History has witnessed that the United States has turned each crisis into opportunities for tremendous national growth. Why do crises become a driving force for growth? What is America’ secret?

I think the secret lies in the democratic idealism and values that the U.S. holds dear.

What Trump is facing now is certainly quite different from what Lincoln faced then.  However, if I draw a perhaps not-perfect parallel between Lincoln’s “North-South” dynamic and Trump’s “America-China” dynamic, my message is quite telling.

Here is an interesting case study. In the early 19th century, the slavery system in the south was on the decline. However, when the cotton plantation started to boom, there was a surge in slave trafficking. In 30 years’ time, the South accumulated tremendous wealth thanks to the free cotton market in the North and extremely low labor cost (slavery, high human rights deficit if you will) in the South. As a result, the slave owners in the South developed “systematic confidence” toward slavery.

 

In the early 1990s, the disintegration of Soviet Union and the Tiananmen massacre nearly led to the collapse of Communist ideology. The whole world optimistically assumed the (communist) history would “end”. In about 30 years’ time, China rapidly grew its economy by largely taking advantage of its human rights deficit and America’s free market. The CCP not only stabilized its rule, it has become increasingly aggressive in its efforts to be the global hegemonic power.

Two hundred years ago, the internal low human rights condition and the external free market has boosted the strength and confidence of slave owners. Similarly, in the past three decades, the internal low human right condition and external free market has boosted the strength and confidence of the CCP authoritarian regime.

Lincoln had a choice: close the Northern market to the South without caring about its Slavery system or end the Slavery system itself.  We all know what Lincoln chose.

 

When dealing with an authoritarian regime like China, will President Trump follow steps of President Lincoln with the South and President Reagan with the Soviet Union?

To conclude, I want to share a true story with you.  A young prisoner in the same prison I was kept received a death penalty for a crime of stealing a couple of motorcycles.  The night before his execution, he said to his inmates: “If there is next life, I will make sure I want to be born again. I will refuse to be born again if I see the Chinese Communist flag. I will agree if I see the Stars and Stripes.”

Dear friends, this is where the greatness of America lies. To make America great again, for President Trump and the American people, Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump are shining examples to follow.

Thank you.

***议报首发,转载请注明出处***

喜欢、支持,请转发分享↓Follow Us 责任编辑:小婉