脸书专页
翻墙交流电报群
RSS/FEED订阅
简体
正體
English
日語
한국어
Deutsch
Français
Русский
Español
Italiano台湾与旧金山和约系列报导 SFPT - 14
来源 – 转载自:Youtube，文章内容并不代表本网立场和观点。
《14》
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ
The Press Conference & Seminar of
The 64th Anniversary of Signing San Francisco Peace Treaty
旧金山和约签约64周年
时间Time: September 9, 2015 (Wed) 10:00 AM
地点Place: Taiwan American Center台湾会馆
4413 Fortran Court, San Jose CA 95134
Taiwan Status 从台湾现况说起
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqA9W9Z3XYY&list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ&index=1
2004年以来台湾民主进程回顾 – 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keh1aQ8u_4o&list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ&index=2
与台湾地位有关的国际条约 – 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clfZXNcOplw&list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ&index=3
二战爆发、珍珠港、苏比克湾轰炸 – 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McVBpJkc56A&list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ&index=4
二战与旧金山和平条约 – 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgeeWTdINEE&list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ&index=5
古巴、波多黎各、菲律宾对台湾的啓示 – 5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H3tRg4gGfY&list=PLniqxcmHbuNxs2Hlz_x0oZtbGavGsdOJZ&index=6
法理台湾、据理力争 – 6a
http://taiwanus.net/news/press/2015/201509021924291914.htm
二战真的结束了吗？
1945年8月6日美国，在日本广岛引爆第一颗原子弹，第二颗於8月9日在长崎，8月15日裕仁天皇透过电台播放预录玉音，向盟军宣告日本无条件投降，日本外交部长重光葵於1945年9月2日，在美国密苏里号军舰上签署降书，由理查德·萨瑟兰见证，二战太平洋战区斯时遂告停火落幕。
就在同一天，麦克阿瑟将军对日本皇军，颁布了他的第一道军令状，要他们向个总各地所属盟军指挥官投降。
第一条A款「在中国 (满洲除外) 、台湾、及北纬16度以北法属越南境内的日本高级将领，应向蒋介石元帅投降。」
从那时起，台湾由蒋介石执行军事占领，即使二次大战已正式结束，但台湾仍被中华民国流亡政权，漫无止境的军事统治。
中华民国於1949年被中华人民共和国打垮、踢出中国，亡命台湾。日本於1951年9月8日，放弃对台湾和澎湖列岛所有权利、权益和主张，於1952年4月28日生效，没有指名谁是台湾主权的授予者，但依据旧金山和平条约，明确指定美国军事政府为主要占领权国。
马英九於8月23日投书华盛顿时报，宣称「1941年当太平洋战争爆发，中华民国即对日本宣战，并废除马关条约」，及根据开罗宣言、波茨坦宣言和日本降书仪，日本与美国两者都依法受到牵制。
真是有够丢脸，一位哈佛大学法学博士毕业生，居然不知开罗宣言，只是盟军就未来，如何结束战争策略之意向书，根本不是合法条约、不具约束力，还有，它只是一纸在开罗电台广播的新闻公报。
波茨坦宣言之所以被日本降书引述，主要是其第8条，规范日本未来领土为：「开罗宣言之条件必须执行，日本领土将局限於，本州、北海道、九州、四国岛，及由我们所决定的岛屿」。
它根本没有涉及台湾和澎湖列岛，事实上，蒋介石并没有出席，这次为规范日本投降条款的重要会议。
马投书更离谱的是，宣称「1971年6月在签署归还冲绳协议之前，美国知会中华民国，只有把钓鱼台列岛管辖权移交给- 不是主权 – 该协议书不影响中华民国的主权要求」。
显然，马统没有研读过旧金山和平条约，第10条指明「日本放弃，一切有关中国之特别权利与利益，包括源自 1901 年 九月七 日，签署於北京之辛丑条约条款」，根本没有触及1895年的马关条约。
第三条「日本将同意美国，对北纬 29 度以南之西南群岛等地（包括琉球群岛及大东群岛），送交联合国托管处置的任何建议，而美国是唯一管理当局。」美国在琉球群岛实施行政管理，直至1971 年6月11日，美日签订《归还冲绳协定》，次年将琉球群岛的行政管理权归还日本，其中包括钓鱼台列屿。这意味着尖阁列岛的主权始终由日本拥有，而不是中华民国。
中华民国在今天世上，甚至没有任何属於自己的领土主权，不拥有台湾、不拥有中国。它只不过是在，美国军事政府「有效总控制」保护伞下，一个「有效控制」台湾的流亡政府，中华民国那有资格，宣称拥有尖阁岛的主权？
没错，2015年标志着第二次世界大战终战70周年，中华民国及中华人民共和国，先後在台湾与中国军演阅兵，吹嘘自己的丰功伟业，说战争结束是他们力抗日本而不是美军的功劳。他们也扭曲了二战真实历史，军事占领在台湾还没正式结束。是的，现在该是正式结束军事占领台湾的时候了，现在该是时候中华民国回归中国，放手台湾，让台湾自主吧。
谢镇宽
加州海沃
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2015/09/03/2003626804/1
TAIPEI TIMES
Home/ Editorials
Thu, Sep 03, 2015 – Page 8
[ LETTER ]
Is World War II really over?
On Aug. 6, 1945, the US detonated an atomic bomb over Hiroshima. It dropped a second one on Nagasaki on Aug. 9.Japanese emperor Hirohito announced through a recorded address over radio the unconditional surrender of Japan to the Allies on Aug. 15. 1945. Then-Japanese minister of foreign affairs Mamoru Shigmitsu signed the Japanese Instrument of Surrender on board the USS Missouri, witnessed by General Richard Sutherland, on Sept. 2, 1945, and the Pacific War, the theatre of World War II that was fought in the Pacific and East Asia, accordingly came to an end.
On the same day, General Douglas MacArthur gave his first general order to the forces of the Empire of Japan to surrender to designated Allied commanders.
Article 1a reads: “The senior Japanese commanders and all ground, sea, air and auxiliary forces within China(excluding Manchuria), Formosa and French Indo-China north of 16 north latitudeshall surrender to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (蒋中正).”
After that, Taiwan was militarily occupied by Chiang, even though the war had ended. Today, Taiwan is still occupied by the exiled government of the Republic of China (ROC).
The ROC was defeated by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in the Chinese Civil War and escaped to Taiwan in 1949.According to the Treaty of San Francisco, Japan renounced all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores on Sept. 8, 1951, effective on April 28, 1952. No recipient was named as the sovereign of Taiwan, however the treaty clearly specified the US military government (USMG) as the principal occupying power.
President Ma Ying-jeou (马英九) wrote a letter to the Washington Times that was published on Aug. 23 claiming: “When the Pacific War broke out in 1941, the Republic of China declared war against Japan and abrogated the Treaty of Shimonoseki,” and Japan and the US are legally bound under the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender.
What a shame that a Harvard University law graduate does not know that the Cairo Declaration was only a declaration of intent of the Allies for their future strategy to end the war, which was not a legal treaty with binding power. By the way, it was only a news communique for radio broadcast in Cairo.
The reason for the Potsdam Proclamation quoted in the Japanese Instrument of Surrender was for the limitation of Japan’s territory in Article 8: “The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine.”
There was no mention of Formosa and the Pescadores. As a matter of fact, Chiang did not even attend this important meeting to regulate the terms of Japanese surrender.
Ma’s letter went on, even more outrageously, claiming: “Prior to the signing of the Okinawa Reversion Agreement in June 1971 between the US and Japan, the US notified the ROC that only administrative rights over the Diaoyutai Islands were being transferred to Japan — not sovereignty — and that the agreement had no effect on the ROC’s sovereignty claim.”
Ma appears not to have read the Treaty of San Francisco at all, because Article 10, “Japan renounces all special rights and interests in China, including all benefits and privileges resulting from the provisions of the final Protocol signed at Peking on 7September 1901,” does not touch on the Shimonoseki Treaty of 1895.
Under Article 3, “Japan will concur in any proposal of the United States to the United Nations to place under its trusteeship system, with the United States as the sole administering authority, Nansei Shoto south of 29deg. north latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands),” the US administered the Ryukyu Islands until June 11,1971, and returned them, including the Senkaku Islands, to Japan under the“1971 Okinawa Reversion Agreement,” which means Japan has sovereignty over the Senkakus, not the ROC.
The ROC does not have sovereign rights over any territory in the world today — not over Taiwan, and not over China. It is only an exiled government with effective control of Taiwan and Pengfu under the umbrella of the USMG holding “overall effective control,” so how can the ROC claim sovereignty over the Diaoyuta is?
Yes, this year marks the 70thanniversary of the end of World War II. Both the ROC and PRC are bragging about their part in ending the war without giving credit to US forces. They also twisted the truth about the war’s history — that the military occupation on Taiwan has not officially ended. Yes, it is time to officially end the military occupation on Taiwan. It is time for the ROC to return to China, take its hands off Taiwan and let Taiwan be free.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
