脸书专页
翻墙交流电报群
RSS/FEED订阅
简体
正體
English
日語
한국어
Deutsch
Français
Русский
Español
Italiano台湾与旧金山和约系列报导 SFPT - 16
来源 – 转载自:Youtube，文章内容并不代表本网立场和观点。
《16》
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmuY4Ygrmfw
https://www.taiwanus.net/news/press/2019/201903130517311792.htm
定位台湾首要之务
长年来国民党洗脑台湾人民，说台湾是中华民国的固有领土，台湾澎湖住民都是中国人。但当我们摊开历史，旧金山和平条约清楚地告诉我们，日本政府根本没有，把台湾的领土主权转交给中国政府。
1952年4月28日签署、同年8月5日生效的台北和约、又称日华和约，旨在结束中国与日本之间的战争。
和约第二条明载：「遵照1951年9月8日所缔结的旧金山和平条约第二条，日本国业已放弃对於台湾及澎湖群岛，以及南沙群岛及西沙群岛之一切权利、名份与要求。」第十条：「中华民国国民，应被视同包括，全体现住台澎居民及其後裔；中华民国法人，应被视同全体依照中华民国在台湾及澎湖，所已施行或将来可能施行之法律规章，所登记之一切法人。」言下之意中华民国国民可分为，包括台澎居民，及非台澎如金马居民。
该和约已於1972年9月29日，因日本与中华人民共和国签署中日公报而作废。
随着台北和约的废除，台湾人民与中华民国已毫无法理联系。而1971年10月25日联合国所通过的2758号决议文，只规范由中华人民共和国，正式成为代表中国，并没有授予台湾的领土主权。
所以台湾与中国没有任何法理从属关系，中国根本无权过问台湾的法理事务。令人遗憾的是，今日在台湾的朝野各界，仍然高举中华民国。国民党徒，在蒋介石与其子蒋经国相继凋零後，从反共转为媚共、亲共，高喊两岸一家亲。虽然他们在台湾还高举着中华民国法统，但是一旦碰到国台办、中华人民共和国代表，就吓得屁滚尿流，有如雪人见光、瞬间消失。
民进党虽然是类属台湾本土政党，但因生长在国民党长时期的党国教育洗脑下，其党纲为，台湾就是中华民国、中华民国就是台湾。
尽管主政的蔡英文总统，坚决不接受习近平所提九二共识及一国两制的维持现状值得肯定，但她排斥东奥正名困守中华台北，司法改革、扁案不审不赦继续维持现状。
这是令人难以恭维。台湾与中华民国究竟存在着什麽样的关系，是到该说清楚讲明白的时候了。
近日美国政府陆续邀请桃园市长郑文灿、基隆市长林右昌到华府访问，给予高规格接待，美国联邦众议员游贺，敦促美国政府协助台湾参与世界卫生大会，展示美国重视台湾。
目前每个政党都忙着，提名他们明年总统大选的候选人。那些有志总统大位者，都应该明确地向选民阐释，其就台湾法理定位的认知与解读，台湾与中华民国、中华人民共和国、美国关系如何界定，及要引领台湾何去何从？
在庆祝台湾关系法40周年的时刻，定位台湾、不属中华，脱胎换骨、迈向国际，是台湾社会不容忽视的课题。
谢镇宽
加州、海沃
https://www.peoplenews.tw/news/325675af-a733-4f47-b7f2-6f03c5f58357
民报
【专文】美国从不承认台湾是中国的一部份
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2019/03/12/2003711310
TAIPEI TIMES
Home / Editorials
Tue, Mar 12, 2019 – Page 8
[ LETTER ]
Identify Taiwan first
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has brainwashed Taiwanese for years, saying that Taiwan is the inherent territory of the Republic of China (ROC), and that the inhabitants of Taiwan and Penghu are Chinese, but the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT) clearly tells us that the Japanese government simply did not transfer Taiwan’s territorial sovereignty to the Chinese government.
Article 2 of the Treaty of Taipei, also known as the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, which was signed on April 28, 1952, and entered into force on August 5 that year, reads: “According to Article 2 of the SFPT signed on 8 September 1951, Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores Islands,” and Article 10 states: “Nationals of the ROC shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan and Penghu and their descendants.”
The Taipei treaty was revoked on Sept. 29, 1972, due to the signing of the Sino-Japanese Joint Communique.
With the abrogation of the treaty, there is no longer any legal connection between Taiwan and the ROC. UN Resolution 2758 only authorized the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the legitimate representative of China in the UN but did not give it sovereignty over Taiwan.
So, the PRC has nothing to do with Taiwan. Regrettably, politicians from all parties hold high the ROC. KMT members have betrayed Chiang Kai-shek (蒋介石) and [former president] Chiang Ching-kuo (蒋经国), moving from anti-communism to pro-communism after their deaths and claiming that they are as close as family.
Although they hold high the ROC legal system in Taiwan, once they meet Taiwan Affairs Office officials, they are scared and swayed, melting like a snowman under sunshine.
In fact, what they are trying to do is to indefinitely consume, spoil and betray Taiwan.
The Democratic Progressive Party is a Taiwanese grassroots party, but it also holds high the ROC after having been brainwashed by the KMT for decades. Its party resolution states that Taiwan is the ROC, and the ROC is Taiwan.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) rejects the “1992 consensus” and “one country two systems,” but she refuses to name the national team “Taiwan” in the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, treading water on judicial reform and pardoning former president Chen Shui-bian (陈水扁), while “maintaining the status quo.”
This is not convincing diehard supporters. Now is the time to clarify what kind of relationship exists between Taiwan and the ROC.
Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (郑文灿) and Keelung Mayor Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) have been invited to visit Washington, receiving a high-level reception.
US Representative Ted Yoho is urging the US government to advocate for Taiwan’s participation in the WHA. The US does care about Taiwan.
Every political party in Taiwan is busy nominating their candidate for the presidential election next year. Those who are running should clearly inform voters about how they see the relation between Taiwan and the ROC, the PRC, and the US, and where this will lead.
At the 40th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act, it is necessary to clarify that Taiwan does not belong to China, and that it will be reborn as a nation and move toward the international community.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
