唐柏橋:美國主流媒體整體淪陷
作者:唐柏橋 —— 2016年10月14日于臉書
美國主流媒體整體淪陷!真沒想到,偏見可以使人如此愚昧和邪惡。他們憎恨川普的程度遠遠超過殺人如麻的金正恩和中共,甚至ISIS。最近包括紐約時報、CNN、雅虎等幾乎所有的主流媒體都不遺餘力地攻擊抹黑川普,而且非常下作。比我過去所見中共對民運的抹黑還有過之無不及,幾乎達到了瘋狂的程度。我的心從來沒有今天這樣悲哀過,因為我曾經認為美國是一個偉大的國家,美國媒體的報導是世界上最客觀公正的。現在看來,一個群體乃至一個國家無論過去多麼文明,要走向墮落也只是瞬間的事情。我現在完全明白了二戰時為什麽以理智著稱的德意志民族會成為戰爭的狂熱鼓吹者,因為一群人甚至有時候一個人的瘋狂會令所有的人走向瘋狂。德國二戰時如此,中國文革時更是如此。通過這件事情,我要更加時時提醒自己,人有罪性的一面,任何時候都不要被偏見和仇恨蒙蔽心智,喪失理智。
值得欣慰的是,現在越來越多的美國人已經意識到了這些與政府和腐爛的華爾街財團(他們很多本身也是其中一份子)勾結的媒體為了利益,已經走向墮落。今天我在雅虎看到一篇攻擊川普的文章,後面的留言卻幾乎是一邊倒地痛斥雅虎和這類腐敗的媒體!這是一個可喜的現象,說明美國正在經歷一場深刻的革命,美國人民正在重新站起來。川普說這是一場戰爭,美國人民與長期把持權力和控制社會資源的舊勢力之間的較量。所有希望這個世界有所改變的人,都應該在這個時候支持川普。未來大家會明白,我們正在經歷一場沒有硝煙的世界大戰。如果我們贏了,我們就有了希望;如果我們輸了,這個世界將隨著以中共為首的邪惡勢力繼續墮落下去。
以下是一位美國人在雅虎網站上的一篇攻擊川普的文章後面的留言,非常用心,也非常精彩。他列舉了裡根在1976年和1980年參選總統時,美國主流媒體和共和黨人對裡根的各種人身攻擊,跟今日攻擊川普如出一轍。裡根最後結束了冷戰,打垮了蘇共,改變了世界,成為公認的美國歷史上最偉大的總統之一。特此轉貼在此,供大家參考。
******
Read to the Bottom:
He’s been divorced and remarried. He can’t commit to anything.」
「He’s dangerously ignorant about international affairs. The Russian leaders will walk all over him.」
「He has no filter – doesn’t think before he speaks.」
· 「Until recently, he was a Democrat. He’s not a real Republican. He
hasn’t paid his GOP dues.」
· 「He used to be Pro Choice. Now, suddenly he’s Pro Life?」
· 「That can’t be his real hair!」
· 「He’s a loose cannon. No one wants HIS finger on the nuclear button.」
· 「His opponent has the experience and political savvy to be
president. He does not.」
· 「He’s just not presidential.」
· 「His temperament disqualifies him from ever being Commander-In-Chief.」
· 「He’s proven himself to be mentally unstable.」
· 「The military will never accept him as Commander-In-Chief. He’s not
smart enough.」
· 「The GOP doesn’t want him to be the head of the party. He could
never reach across the aisle to get anything done.」
· 「Most Republican voters will just stay home rather than go out and
vote for him.」
· 「He’s almost 70 – much too old to be president.」
· 「Evangelicals will never support him.」
· 「He says ‘(Let』s) Make America Great Again’. How dare he say we
aren’t still great?!?!」
· “His intellect is thinner than spit on a slate rock.」
· 「90 percent of Republican state chairmen judge him guilty of
‘simplistic approaches,’ with ‘no depth in federal government
administration’ and ‘no experience in foreign affairs.’」
· 「His spontaneity with reporters and voters plays well but also gives
him plenty of space to disgorge fantasies and factual errors so
prolific and often outrageous that he single-handedly makes the word
gaffe a permanent fixture in America』s political vernacular. He
confuses Pakistan with Afghanistan. He claimed once that trees
contributed 93 percent of the atmosphere』s nitrous oxide…」
· 「After all his gaffes, he doubles down on them instead of admitting
he made a mistake.」
· 「He’s threatening to upend our treaties and relationships with our
allies by demanding that they pay for their own defense!」
· 「Because of his gross factual errors, he might take rash action and
needlessly lead this country into open warfare!」
· 「He’s racist, xenophobic, and fuels the fires of hatred!」
· “You shouldn’t take him seriously. He has a penchant for offering
simplistic solutions to hideously complex problems and a stubborn
insistence that he is always right in every argument.」
· “The rising turnout of his voters are not loyal Republicans or
Democrats and are alienated from both parties because neither takes a
sympathetic view toward their issues.」
· 「He wears the disdain he draws from the GOP elites as a badge of
honor. Henry Kissinger』s championing the other GOP candidate and
attacking him are actually helping him!」
· “The fact that he could be deemed a serious candidate for president
is a shame and embarrassment for the country.」
· The New Yorker observed that his appeal 「has to do not with
competence at governing but with the emotion he evokes… [He] lets
people get out their anger and frustration, their feeling of being
misunderstood and mishandled by those who have run our government,
their impatience with taxes and with the poor and the weak, their
impulse to deal with the world』s troublemakers by employing the
stratagem of a punch in the nose.」
· 「His unpopular opponent presided over the current Iranian crisis…
and a reeling economy, yet surely the Democrat will prevail over him.」
· “Is he Safe? …he shoots from the hip … he’s over his head … What are
his solutions?」
· 「Voters want to follow some authority figure, — a leader who can
take charge with authority; return a sense of discipline to our
government; and, manifest the willpower needed to get this country
back on track — or at least a leader from outside Washington.」
Sound familiar? You’ve heard this all about Donald Trump, right? Try again.
All this was said of Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980. Most of it was BY OTHER REPUBLICANS – and Reagan turned out to be one of the greatest presidents of the 20th Century, if not of all time –
- 🔥免費PC翻牆、安卓VPN翻牆APP
- 🔥靈魂之謎|中華文化|治國大道
(待續)選自唐柏橋先生授權禁書網獨家首發電子書:《唐柏橋文集:我為什麽支持川普》


臉書專頁
粉絲交流群